Saturday, December 28, 2019
How to Make Magnetic Slime
Put a twist on the classic slime science project by making magnetic slime. This is slime that reacts to a strong magnetic field, like a ferrofluid, but its easier to control. Its easy to make, too. Here is what you do: Magnetic Slime Materialsà white school glue (e.g., Elmers glue)liquid starchiron oxide powderà rare earth magnets Ordinary magnets are not strong enough to have much of an effect on magnetic slime. Try a stack of neodymium magnets for the best effect. Liquid starch is sold with laundry aids. Iron oxide is sold with scientific supplies and is available online. Magnetic iron oxide powder is also called powdered magnetite. Make Magnetic Slime You could simply mix the ingredients together at once, but once the slime polymerizes, it difficult to get the iron oxide to mix in evenly. The project works better if you mix the iron oxide powder with either the liquid starch or glue first. Stir 2 tablespoons of iron oxide powder into 1/4 cup of liquid starch. Continue stirring until the mixture is smooth.Add 1/4 cup of glue. You can mix the slime together with your hands or you can wear disposable gloves if you dont want to get any black iron oxide dust on your hands.You can play with magnetic slime just like you would with regular slime, plus it is attracted to magnets and is viscous enough to blow bubbles Safety and Clean Up If you wrap the magnets with plastic wrap, you can keep the slime from sticking to them.Clean up slime using warm, soapy water.Do not eat the slime, since too much iron is not good for you.Do not eat magnets. There is a recommended age listed on magnets for this reason.This project is not suitable for young childrenà since they might eat slime or magnets. Ferrofluid is more liquid than magnetic slime, so it forms better-defined shapes when exposed to a magnetic field, while the silly putty is stiffer than the slime and can crawl slowly toward a magnet. All of these projects work best with rare earth magnets rather than iron magnets. For a strong magnetic field, use an electromagnet, which can be made by running an electric current through a coil of wire.
Friday, December 20, 2019
Battle of the Books Ethan Frome vs. Of Mice and Men...
Battle of the Books: Ethan Frome vs. Of Mice and MenMany novels are meant to be enjoyed by the reader as they are read. Some novels may relate to everyday relationships, while others may relate to society in general. Two authors that deal with these topics are Edith Wharton and John Steinbeck. Edith Wharton born Edith Newbold Jones to a wealthy family in New York combined her insiders view of Americas privileged classes with a brilliant, natural wit to write humorous and incisive novels and short stories. On the other hand, John Steinbeck, born on February 27, 1902, in Salinas, California spent his summers working on nearby ranches. His inspiration came from everyday life as a worker. Ethan Frome, the title character of Edith Whartonsâ⬠¦show more contentâ⬠¦The climax of this novel is when Ethan and Mattie confess their love for each other and decide to commit suicide by sledding into a large tree. The falling action was that Ethan and Mattie regain consciousness after crashin g into the tree; Ethan takes both of them in and cares for them into old age. His struggles are exacerbated by his surroundings such as Zeena his wife, the bleak Starkfield landscape, and his home which often takes on an oppressive quality. Mattie was Zeenas cousin and Ethans lover. This novel shows how even though Ethan and Zeena are married; Ethan loves Mattie more than he could possibly love Zeena. Its bad enough to see the two women sitting there - but his face, when he looks around that bare place, just kills me (Chapter 10). On the other hand, Of Mice and Men, a tragic fictional novel about two migrant workers in California during the Great Depression who were George Milton, intelligent and evil, but caring; and Lennie Small, an ironically named man of large stature and immense strength, but limited mental abilities come to a ranch near Soledad south-east of Salinas, California to. George may seem like a mean guy for example in this quote: Whatever we aint got, thats what you want. God amighty, if I was alone I could live so easy. I could go get a job an work, an no trouble. No mess at all, and when the end of the month come I could take my fifty bucks and go into town and get
Thursday, December 12, 2019
Contrast and Comparison to Medication â⬠Free Samples to Students
Question: Discuss about the Contrast and Comparison to Medication. Answer: Introduction According to Blank (2011), the medication error is one of the most common mistakes made during reporting errors in the emergency department. He further states that most of this errors occur during the administration phase of the patient to the hospital. The purpose of this study (Back to Basic) is meant to reduce the administration medical errors that often take place in the emergency department. This errors get handled by reinforcing the underlying administration medical procedures which will reduce the emergency errors in the department. The study took three months where 75% of out of the 127 nurses participated in the research, and the method that got used in the study was educational intervention. Moreover, the Do not interrupt" study aims at evaluating practical techniques that will decrease non-medical related interruptions of the nurses during administrating medication (Westbrook, 2017). The study took eight weeks where 227 nurses participated in the study, and they administer ed 4781 medications. The general purpose of this paper is to have an understanding of the two studies and how they relate to each other during medication administration. The purpose of the study was to reduce the number of administration medical errors that often happen in the emergency department. According to Blank (2011), the following review was a 3-month educational intervention which used a single group that was not randomized and comparisons made on the pre-post outcome of the results. The educational interventions made where to address the current medication errors experienced in the emergency department. The methods used in the response are IV administration and preventing errors and the relevant recommended practices that reduce medication administration errors. According to Huckles-Baumgart (2014), research on medication errors are usually focused on isolated phases within the medication administration process. On the study, 75 percent of the nurses out of a total number of 127 participated in the study and three measures were used during the pre and post-intervention of the survey (Blank, 2011). These methods were tests done to acquire kn owledge on the medical administration procedures and the use of the study to understand the behavior of the participants when the recommended medication got administered. Another method used was the use of chart reviews and voluntary error reports that gave understanding about the medical administration errors that often occur. According to Blank (2011), the findings of the study show that 91 percent of the nurses achieved a perfect score during the post-test while 69 percent received a perfect score during the pre-test. From the post-survey, the nurses in their significant proportions responded that they followed the recommended practice most of the time which increased during 8 out of 10 questions in the survey. However, the results found from the study did not reach the required statistical significance. On the other hand, during the chart review, the nurses scored 299 during the pre-test while 295 scored during the post-test which still revealed little change in the total medica tion errors. The survey method accounted for 25 percent of the findings of the research while 24 percent was on the charts review. In the voluntary report, the medication errors dropped by a significant number that is from 1.28 to 0.99 failures out of 1000 patients (Blank, 2011). Through the study, there were concerns about the effectiveness of the methods used, and this provided the clinicians with better policy-making ideas that would improve safety during medication administration (Acheampong, 2014). Critique of the Back to Basic Approach to Medication The use of educational intervention is certified as sufficient during the study because it provides improved knowledge on the recommended medication administering practices though it does not translate to be an essential change in medication administration practice. Furthermore, the method was fit for the study because it provided some variation within the three months. The sample size was 75% of the 127 nurses who participated in the survey was also sufficient for the study. Therefore, the survey and chart review as the internal validity of the study because they provide emphasis made by the research while the external validity can be referred to as the educational intervention used in the research study as the general method (Blank, 2011). However, the method used was not sufficient because it did not give the required change as expected when the research began. The purpose of the study was to reduce the number of interruptions that nurses of often face while administering medication. According to Westbrook (2017), a random survey of an eight parallel cluster is done in a major teaching hospital to understand the best method that can be used to reduce interruption of nurses when they are administering medication. During the study, randomization got done on four wards, and the interventions made were comprised of putting on a vest during medication administration and patient and nurse education. Furthermore, there were strategic measures put to divert any interruptions and creation of reminders. As the study commenced, the intervention got blinded to the control wards then direct structured observations were made on the administering medication processes. The primary findings of the study were not related to the medication interruptions when administering proper dose medication. The secondary results of the survey indicated the rate of multit asking and total interruptions conducted by the study of the nurses' experience (Westbrook, 2017). From the study, there was 4781 medications administered by 227 nurses over a span of 8 weeks (364.7 hours). Moreover, there were 57 interruptions out of 100 administrations that the nurses experienced during the period where 87.9 percent of the disruptions were not related to any of the medication tasks under observation (Westbrook, 2017). Moreover, there was a reduction in the number of non- related medication interruptions which were 50 out of the 100 administrations made. There was also reduction in the medication route and ward type in the control cluster that reduced by 15 of the unrelated medication interruptions out of 100 administrations. According to Westbrook (2017), this reduction was significant in that it had far reduced number compared to the control wards. The post-survey study was completed by 88 nurses while nurses in the intervention ward reported that the vests consu med a lot of time and cumbersome. The intervention was supported by 48 percent of the nurses for it to become hospital policy. The method that was used for the study was not sufficient because it did not provide the required change within the span of 8 weeks it was conducted. Furthermore, the sample size used was adequate for the study because 4781 medications were able to be administered by the 227 nurses who participated in the study. Moreover, the method which is the use intervention got associated with a significant reduction in the unrelated medication interruptions, and this reduction has a significant effect on the medication error rates. The internal validity of the study are the use of strategic measures put to prevent and interruptions, putting on of a vest during medication administration and nurse and patient education. The external validity of the research study was the randomization of four wards as the general method used in the research study. Comparison of the Two Approaches to Medication The Back to Basic' and Do not interrupt' approaches to medication have a significance in contributing to factors that affect the effective administration of medication to patients. For instance, during operations, some interruptions can occur, and the medical personnel got focused on administering medication which reduces the medication errors that may arise. According to Anderson (2010), drug information is also very crucial during the administration of medication on the patient. It can be related to the drug packaging and labeling which is essential in preventing any medication errors. For instance, some patients received an overdose of heparin drugs due to misleading labeling and packaging and this medication error resulted in the death of three infants. Another factor that may lead to clinical issues is the environment in which the medication gets administered. For example, a research conducted in Malta shows that 37 percent of the nurses agreed that physical tiredness was a key factor that led to medication errors when nurses got tired and ignored some of the procedures required before giving medication (Karavasiliadou, 2014). Moreover, observations made indicate that the rate at which medication errors reported as voluntary is low (Aronson, 2009). It means that the Do not Interrupt' approach had to occur first so as for the Back to Basic' approach happens because the error may occur during administering dosage to the patient. From this article, we can understand that Back to Basic' and Do not interrupt' approaches to medication have a connection in that the dosage administered must be inaccurate for the medication error to occur. The Do not Interrupt approach can be stated as the most significant method because its the one that often occurs in hospitals compared to the Back to Basic method. Furthermore, the Do not Interrupt approach is the one that often happens before the Back to Basic approach takes place. Therefore, it essential when nurses get updates about the medication errors that may have occurred in their facility so that they can understand the best ways of administering medication dosages thus preventing any mistakes from happening in the future. It is essential when nurses understand the errors that occur and the necessity of reporting them in case they occur (Svitlica, 2017). References Acheampong, F., Anto, B. P., Koffuor, G. A. (2014). Medication safety strategies in hospitalsa systematic review.International Journal of Risk Safety in Medicine,26(3), 117-131. Anderson, P., Townsend, T., CCRN-CMC, C. B. (2010). Medication errors.American Nurse Today, 23-27. Aronson,J.K. (2009) Medication errors: what they are, how they happen, and how to avoid them. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, Volume 102, Issue 8, 1 August 2009, Pages 513-521,https;//doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcpo52 Blank, F. S., Tobin, J., Macomber, S., Jaouen, M., Dinoia, M., Visintainer, P. (2011). A back to basics approach to reduce ED medication errors.Journal of emergency nursing,37(2), 141-147. Huckels?Baumgart, S., Manser, T. (2014). Identifying medication error chains from critical incident reports: a new analytic approach.The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology,54(10), 1188-1197. Karavasiliadou, S., Athanasakis, E. (2014). An inside look into the factors contributing to medication errors in the clinical nursing practice.Health science journal,8(1). Svitlica, B. B., Simin, D., Milutinovi?, D. (2017). Potential causes of medication errors: perceptions of Serbian nurses.International nursing review,64(3), 421-427. Westbrook, J. I., Li, L., Hooper, T. D., Raban, M. Z., Middleton, S., Lehnbom, E. C. (2017). Effectiveness of a Do not interruptbundled intervention to reduce interruptions during medication administration: a cluster randomised controlled feasibility study.BMJ Qual Saf,26(9), 734-742.
Wednesday, December 4, 2019
Critical Overview of the Climate Change for Global Warming
Question: Discuss about theCritical Overview of the Climate Change for Global Warming. Answer: Introduction The aim of this paper is to discuss the issue of global warming as examined by Davidson. It documents and expounds the aspects of the factors that contribute to the factors that propel and exacerbate climate change, an assessment of climate change on our everyday lives and the planet and finally a range of recommendations that would be helpful in mitigating climate change. Causes of climate change Climate change is a burning issue and demands immediate attention. The temperature of Earth is contingent on the equipoise between entering and exiting the system of Earth. The energy from the sun known as the incoming energy keeps the surface of the Earth warm. Earth avoids warming when the energy from the sun is reflected back into the space. The Earth cools when the absorbed energy is liberated back into the space. Scientists have found that there has been a variation in the climate for a long time range (Redshaw et al., 2013). Climate change is also triggered. During the epoch of industrliazation, climate change was attributed to mostly natural factors like volcanic eruptions, solar energy and green house emissions. The Green House gases comprise of carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4) and water vapour (H2O). The problem with greenhouse is that it makes the Earth warmer that the usual temperature of the Earth which is commonly known as the greenhouse effect. The composition of gre enhouse has severe implications on the environment. The absorption of carbon dioxide and its liberation is part of the natural carbon cycle through the respiration of animals and plants (Aldy Pizer, 2015). Apart from this, the plethora of human activities like combusting the fossil fuels and the transformations in the usage of land also liberate a wide amount of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. It has been found that there has been an increase for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. Another cause that triggers the presence of carbon dioxide is the volcanic eruption. It is estimated that the multifarious activities of human beings is responsible for the presence of over 30 billion tons of CO2 (Anderson, Hawkins Jones, 2016). Impact of climate change on our lives and the planet Davidson is of the view that scientists have not reached a consensus regarding the temperature sensitivity of the soil. The drastic change in the climate can pose pernicious health risks to the future generation as has been envisaged by the environmentalists and moral philosophers. One less discussed aspect of the change in climate is damage to properties. Pollution of the global atmosphere would portend to be damaging anything for the future generations (Davidson Janssens, 2006). Davidson believes that the present generation has the responsibility of not encroaching on the resources of the future generation. The environmental factors due to global warming is the melting of ice like the glaciers, mountains, ice sheets stretching over Greenland and West Antarctica and also the ice sheets on the Arctic sea. There has been a rise in the sea level due to the melting of icebergs and ice sheets. There has been a complete metamorphosis in the climatic conditions an increase in precipitatio n on the global level. The rise in global temperature has been detrimental for important species of fauna whereas beneficial for invasive species. For example, there has been a decline of Adelie penguins in the Antarctic region-their numbers have fallen from 32,000 to 11,000 over the last decade (Constable et al., 2014). On the other hand, there has been a proliferation in the growth of spruce bark beetles in Alaska that are known for consuming up spruce trees. It is predicted that there will an increase in natural disasters due to the effects of climate change. For example, floods, droughts, storms and hurricanes will become stronger if climate change is not mitigated. There is the prognosis that there will be a spread of malaria and the revival of the Zika virus (Global Climate Change, 2018. )Since there will be an alteration in the ecosystems, species that would not be able to migrate to compatible regions as a response to the climate change will extinct. Our power to combat climate change Human beings have the agency and the power to act sensibly to climate change. There needs to be a change in orientation in our everyday interaction with the environment. The first step is to subscribe to environment-friendly vehicles that would save and conserve energy. Cycling and walking can be a small step but it can go a long way in this initiative. In 2013, it was estimated that 44 per cent of the electric generation is an outcome of the renewable (Change, 2014). One can opt for battery chargers that can save $100 million of electricity bill and at the same time prevent the rise in greenhouse gases into the atmosphere. Human beings should ensure that their activities have minimal effect on the environment. The use of low-carbon sinks is one such step. People can use renewable power alternatives generated from the natural energy. Improper method of garbage disposal in the landfills will trigger the production of methane gas (Greaver et al., 2016). Therefore, human beings need to judiciously dispose their waste may be through the composting of kitchen scraps or through garden trimmings. Travelling via air has pernicious effects on the environment and therefore, it is sensible to cut down on air travel. There is also a need to change the consumption pattern whether in terms of automobiles or food. Purchasing products in bulk amount can be useful in lowering the amount on plastic wrapping or other associated packaging materials. Conclusion The factors contributing to climate change is the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Carbon dioxide is one of the most important reason for the rise in global temperature and so as methane gas. The drastic change in climate poses threat to the destruction of various species on the planet. In the Antarctic and Greenland regions, there has been a massive melting of ice sheets and icebergs that will rise the sea level. The need of the hour is to adopt a sustainable lifestyle and reduce the adversities of climate change and will be beneficial for the future generations. References Aldy, J. E., Pizer, W. A. (2015). The competitiveness impacts of climate change mitigation policies.Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists,2(4), 565-595. Anderson, T. R., Hawkins, E., Jones, P. D. (2016). CO2, the greenhouse effect and global warming: from the pioneering work of Arrhenius and Callendar to today's Earth System Models.Endeavour,40(3), 178-187. Change, I. P. O. C. (2014). IPCC.Climate change. Constable, A. J., Melbourne?Thomas, J., Corney, S. P., Arrigo, K. R., Barbraud, C., Barnes, D. K., ... Davidson, A. T. (2014). Climate change and Southern Ocean ecosystems I: how changes in physical habitats directly affect marine biota.Global Change Biology,20(10), 3004-3025. Davidson, E. A., Janssens, I. A. (2006). Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change.Nature,440(7081), 165. Global Climate Change. (2018).Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet. Retrieved 28 March 2018, from https://climate.nasa.gov/ Greaver, T. L., Clark, C. M., Compton, J. E., Vallano, D., Talhelm, A. F., Weaver, C. P., ... Felker-Quinn, E. (2016). Key ecological responses to nitrogen are altered by climate change.Nature Climate Change,6(9), 836. Redshaw, C. H., Stahl-Timmins, W. M., Fleming, L. E., Davidson, I., Depledge, M. H. (2013). Potential changes in disease patterns and pharmaceutical use in response to climate change.Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part B,16(5), 285-320.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)